A critic
praised the director’s work in a recent play, calling it “masterful.” Since the
primary definition of masterful is
“imperious, domineering, bullying,” it might be supposed that the word should
have been masterly. Masterly means “demonstrating a
thorough knowledge, a superior skill.”
This
distinction between the two words is insisted upon in the Oxford English Dictionary. Bryan A. Garner in A Dictionary of Modern American Usage upholds that view, suggesting
the words are often confounded because of the awkwardness of saying masterlily, when the word is used
adverbially. It sounds much better
to say the play was “masterfully
directed.”
But
wait! Merriam-Webster says this
hard-and-fast distinction between the two words is a recent innovation, and
that historically masterful and masterly both had two meanings:
“domineering, like a master,” but also “skilled and knowledgeable, like a
master.” Both –ful and –ly (as well as –ous and –ish) are
suffixes that can be attached to nouns to form adjectives indicating likeness. Sometimes
as with masterful and masterly (or wonderful and wondrous),
adjectives with similar meanings develop with different suffixes.
Both masterful and masterly developed by the fifteenth century with the same double
meanings. Somewhere along the way masterly
lost the primary meaning of “imperious” and came to mean only the second,
i.e. “skilled and knowledgeable.”
According
to the folks at Merriam-Webster, an unnamed twentieth-century grammar Nazi
decreed that since masterly had lost
one of its meanings, it would be only fitting that masterful should also lose one. Therefore, this pundit concluded, masterful henceforth could mean only “domineering,” not “skillful.”
So go ahead
and call the director “masterful” if you like. She may be skillful, but chances are, being a director, she's probably pretty imperious, too.
The Bard of
Buffalo Bayou qualifies as a master—of cognitive chaos, philosophical
incoherence, and verbal dreck. A
case in point:
A
masterly Master of Arts
Was
renowned for the sound of his farts.
Each
time he was goosed,
The
effect it produced
Was
greater than the sum of his parts.
No comments:
Post a Comment