The New York Times recently had a clever puzzle in which the final
answer could be either HEADS or TAILS, depending on how you solved the clues
for the crossing words. There were
four clues that could have been answered either H or T, E or A, A or I, and D
or L, to provide the alternate solutions. For example, “Improves, in a way” could have been answered
with either HONES or TONES, “Diner menu item” could be either MELT or MALT, and
so on.
Conundrums of
this sort are known as Schrödinger puzzles, named for the logical paradox known
as Schrödinger’s Cat. A response to what is known as the Copenhagen
Interpretation of quantum mechanics, it was devised by the Austrian physicist
Erwin Schrödinger. The paradox posits a cat in a sealed container that will die
if poison is released by a decaying subatomic particle. As there is no way to
know whether the particle has decayed without opening the box, and therefore
whether the cat is dead or alive, logical theory (says Schrödinger) demands that
we conclude the cat is both alive and dead at the same time.
Understood? Well, not by me.
The most
acclaimed Schrödinger puzzle was created by Jeremiah Farrell and ran in The New York Times on Election Day
1996. Depending on whether you
answered BAT or CAT to the clue “Black Halloween animal”) and similarly for six
other possibilities, the answer came out either CLINTON or BOB DOLE. I guess you know which answer proved
correct.
The Bard of
Buffalo Bayou has no problem with grasping Schrödinger’s principle, since he
has been simultaneously lucid and incoherent all his life. See for yourself:
Old
Bob Dole
Fell
in a hole
And
landed on his tush,
But
his rescue crew
Did
not have a clue
Whether
to pull or to push.
So
he stayed in the gorge,
And
his saviors, by George,
Wandered
off under a Bush.
No comments:
Post a Comment